-Read more
-Work out more
-Learn more about psychotheraphy
-Stop eating so much fucking chocolate
-pull Natasha from work :)
Michael
Sunday 27 April 2008
Back
I'm going to start updating this again, I started really slacking off this year.
I spend most of my days lately watching The Sopranos and choding out. The least I can do is update this shit.
Going to go and watch MORE Sopranos, and then Wrestling. Rejoining the gym tommorow.
I'll post up later about my recent spending binges, Amsterdam, and all of the usual lifestyle bullshit later on.
Michael
I spend most of my days lately watching The Sopranos and choding out. The least I can do is update this shit.
Going to go and watch MORE Sopranos, and then Wrestling. Rejoining the gym tommorow.
I'll post up later about my recent spending binges, Amsterdam, and all of the usual lifestyle bullshit later on.
Michael
Tuesday 8 April 2008
The End of the World
I've been thinking about Armageddon. I watched a programme the other day about Nostradamus' 'Lost Book', the one where he predicts the end of the world. It all makes sense to me. The world is a terrible place full of egotistical idiots intent on destroying themselves and each other. Humans think they're special and clever, they're the only species I know of which kill each other though, maybes some other animals do, but on nowhere near the scale humans do.
There are two problems in this world, one is the human ego and the other is democracy. The best book I've read lately is A Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. What I particuarly liked about it, was how he perfectly captures the absurdity of human kind. My problem with democracy is, when you give everyone a say, you're creating MAJOR problems. People need leadership, they need to be told what to do. People aren't born the same, some people are born smart, and some are born stupid. Some are born strong and some are born weak, some are born natural leaders, and others have no leadership qualities. Why should weak, stupid people have a say?
If you had all leaders, or ALPHAS they would kill each other. If you had all weak people with no leadership BETAS together, they would end up killing each other too. Sure enough, the strongest beta would take some kind of leadership role, but the leadership abilities of this person wouldn't be on par with the abilities of a natural ALPHA and it would eventually fuck up. What you always had before the last few hundred years was a real structured hierarchy to society.
You'd have a king at the top, the leader, and then orders flowing all the way down the line. Obviously this wasn't always an entirely perfect system and there was flaws, then mostly within the past 100or so years, you have all of these goddamn idiots asking for equality, and some lunatic gives people equality, now the weak BETAS have as much power as the naturally strong ALPHAS and what you're left with is society in decay and a recipe for disaster.
What's inevitable is with this system is, you're going to have the betas end up leading the alphas, because the betas are always more amiable and personable than the naturally assertive alphas, and you'll have the weak and stupid leading the strong and clever. The natural order of things will become more and more repressed until humanity ultimately implodes in on itself entirely.
The only way is down, unless there is a rapid change and humanity shifts from it's present insidious ego-driven ways, and eschews everything and regresses back to the way things were, the human race will destroy itself. Of course, social conditioning will dictate that regressing back thousands of years and eschewing all creature comforts and their ego driven ways, the whole of humanity is every day getting closer and closer to their end. It will dictate that it would mean repressing people, and repression is wrong and equality is moral and the ''right-thing'' to do.
Of course, who really cares about the fact that for the first time in the history of the planet humans have created dangerous levels of global warming from their frighteningly excessive uses of fossil fuels et al, that the whole human race is so perilously close to its own demise and it's all humanities own fault? Who cares about that? Who wants to regress back to the way things were thousands of years ago and actually survive when they have iPods and Nintendo WII's?
This planet is doomed. I predict 2012. Game over.
-M
There are two problems in this world, one is the human ego and the other is democracy. The best book I've read lately is A Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. What I particuarly liked about it, was how he perfectly captures the absurdity of human kind. My problem with democracy is, when you give everyone a say, you're creating MAJOR problems. People need leadership, they need to be told what to do. People aren't born the same, some people are born smart, and some are born stupid. Some are born strong and some are born weak, some are born natural leaders, and others have no leadership qualities. Why should weak, stupid people have a say?
If you had all leaders, or ALPHAS they would kill each other. If you had all weak people with no leadership BETAS together, they would end up killing each other too. Sure enough, the strongest beta would take some kind of leadership role, but the leadership abilities of this person wouldn't be on par with the abilities of a natural ALPHA and it would eventually fuck up. What you always had before the last few hundred years was a real structured hierarchy to society.
You'd have a king at the top, the leader, and then orders flowing all the way down the line. Obviously this wasn't always an entirely perfect system and there was flaws, then mostly within the past 100or so years, you have all of these goddamn idiots asking for equality, and some lunatic gives people equality, now the weak BETAS have as much power as the naturally strong ALPHAS and what you're left with is society in decay and a recipe for disaster.
What's inevitable is with this system is, you're going to have the betas end up leading the alphas, because the betas are always more amiable and personable than the naturally assertive alphas, and you'll have the weak and stupid leading the strong and clever. The natural order of things will become more and more repressed until humanity ultimately implodes in on itself entirely.
The only way is down, unless there is a rapid change and humanity shifts from it's present insidious ego-driven ways, and eschews everything and regresses back to the way things were, the human race will destroy itself. Of course, social conditioning will dictate that regressing back thousands of years and eschewing all creature comforts and their ego driven ways, the whole of humanity is every day getting closer and closer to their end. It will dictate that it would mean repressing people, and repression is wrong and equality is moral and the ''right-thing'' to do.
Of course, who really cares about the fact that for the first time in the history of the planet humans have created dangerous levels of global warming from their frighteningly excessive uses of fossil fuels et al, that the whole human race is so perilously close to its own demise and it's all humanities own fault? Who cares about that? Who wants to regress back to the way things were thousands of years ago and actually survive when they have iPods and Nintendo WII's?
This planet is doomed. I predict 2012. Game over.
-M
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)